MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2350140002

Discussion on the Choice of Refrigerants in Centrifugal Chillers

2008· article· en· W2350140002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jiang Neng-zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueRefrigeration Air Conditioning & Electric Power Machinery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefrigerantChillerMontreal ProtocolLimit (mathematics)Environmental scienceEngineeringThermodynamicsChemistryMathematicsMechanical engineeringPhysicsGas compressorOzone layer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The two substitutive refrigerants HFC134a and HCFC123 in centrifugal chillers were described and the safety performance,efficiency and some other factors of the two refrigerants were synthetically compared.From safety performance aspects,HFC134a is better.From the dimension of efficiency,HCFC123 has a little better effect.Since the ODP of HCFC123 is not zero,according to the Montreal Protocol it will be forbidden in the time limit.On the other hand the emission of HFCs was confined in the Kyoto Protocol.Finally on the base of Chinese national condition the risk analysis of using HCFC123 was established.The author believes HFC134a should be the main trend substitutive refrigerant at present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRefrigeration Air Conditioning & Electric Power MachinerySame topicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207