MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2350249170

THE APPLICATION OF NEW 1∶200 000 REGIONAL GEOCHEMICAL METHODS TO WUCHAGOU SHEET IN INNER MONGOLIAN FOREST-SWAMP AREA

2003· article· en· W2350249170 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical and Geochemical Exploration · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySwampInner mongoliaMineralization (soil science)ProspectingGeochemistryEarth scienceMining engineeringPhysical geographySoil scienceSoil waterArchaeologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New methods and technologies were used to conduct 1∶200 000 regional geochemical exploration in Wuchagou sheet, Inner Mongolia. The regional geochemical information obtained quite objectively reflects surface geochemical characteristics of lithosphere in this area. Quite a few geochemical anomalies with oreprospecting significance were detected, which, as shown by preliminary inspection, reflect mineralization. Characteristics of geochemical background distribution provide relatively objective geochemical data for the evaluation of resources and environment and the study of basic geology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it