Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To examine the depressive symptoms and the relevant factors in chronic schizophrenic patients.Method:The Chinese version of Calgary depression scale for schizophrenia(CDSS),the positive syndrome scale(SAPS),negative syndrome scale(SANS),treatment emergent symptom scale(TESS)and the questionaire for relevant factors of depression were administered to 180 inpatients with chronic schizophrenia.Results:The incidence of depression in chronic schizophrenic inpatients was 40.6%.The patients with and without depressive symptoms showed significant differences in total disease course,times of hospitalization,degree of education,family economic level,social supports,the recovery of insight,times of having drugs,drug types and doses,drug side-effects,the positive and negative symptoms,complications.The binary Logistic analysis indicated that the factors influencing the depression were the negative symptoms,complication,types of anti-psychotropic drugs,social supports,the insight and the drug side-effects.Conclusion:The incidence of depression in chronic schizophrenic inpatients is high and influencing factors are great,and depression should be treated and prevented in different ways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".