MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2350314658

Parallel Computing Strategy for a 3D Hybrid Unstructured Navier-Stokes Solver

2005· article· en· W2350314658 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
WU Yi-zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomain decomposition methodsSolverComputer scienceParallel computingMessage Passing InterfaceComputational scienceNavier–Stokes equationsUnstructured gridMessage passingFinite volume methodOverhead (engineering)SupercomputerComputational fluid dynamicsFinite element methodEngineeringAerospace engineeringMechanicsCompressibility
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A parallel computing strategy for a 3D hybrid unstructured Navier-Stokes solver has been developed. The Navier-Stokes equations are solved by a face based finite volume method which is suitable for arbitrary mesh type. The Spalart-Allmaras one-equation turbulence model is implemented to evaluate the turbulent viscosity. Parallel computation is based on the domain decomposition method and load balance is achieved by using METIS system. The Message Passing Interface (MPI) library routines are utilized to pass information between processors and non-blocking communications are used to minimize the communications overhead. The dynamic allocation feature of FORTRAN 90 is fully exploited to reduce the memory requirement. Finally the parallel code is applied to simulation of viscous flow around the DLR-F6 geometry(wing-body-pylon-nacelle) to validate its accuracy, high parallel performance and the ability to deal with complex geometries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Aeronautica Et Astronautica SinicaSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207