Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To study the treatment and prevent periprosthetic fractures of femur in total hip arthroplasty retrospectively.Methods: According to the classification of Vancouver, 8 cases of periprosthetic fractures of the femur in total hip arthroplasty in recent years were analyzed. There were three cases of type A1, three cases of type B1, one case of type B2, one case of type B3. Open reduction and fixation with wires and allograft cortical strut bone or a long-stem cemented prosthesis revision were performed respectively. Results: Through eight to eighteen months follow-up, all the fractures were united, and incoorperation occured between the strut bone and host bone. The prosthesis stem fixed well. Conclusion: Vancouver classification in the periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty is a simple and practical method. Onlay allograft cortical strut bone and fixed with wires for the treatment of periprosthetic fracture of the femur is a practical method, this method can not only promote the fracture union but also restore the bone stock.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".