Genetic Potentiality of Canada Inbred Lines to Improve Heilongjiang Province Elite Hybrids
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The improved effect of 8 Canada introduced maize inbred lines by NCII design was analyzed to estimate the improved effect of introduced Canada maize inbred lines which in the same latitude with Heilongjiang province,and to provide macro guidance for maize breeding.The results showed that inbred line C06 was considered as the best at the aspect of comprehensive performance,C05 was second.The better effect would be obtained by utilizing C06 in a breeding process of improved elite single-cross in many traits.C05 had the highest improved value on plant type traits,and progress would be obtained by utilizing it to improve the plant type traits.The comprehensive performance of inbred lines C01,C02,C03 were in an average,but C03 performed best than any other inbred lines at the aspect of improving kernel rows.The better effect would be obtained by utilizing C07 and C08 to improve the earliness of elite single-cross,though the two inbred lines performed poor than other lines at other traits.Inbred lines C04 was the worst at the aspect of comprehensive performance,and had no prominent improved superiority at other traits,it could be eliminated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it