MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2350604042

Finite Element Analysis of the Exterally Prestressed CFRP Continous Beam

2014· article· en· W2350604042 on OpenAlexaff
YE Zen, Binbin Hua

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Jilin Institute of Architecture & Civil Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsCanadian Council on International Law
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringFinite element methodBeam (structure)Deformation (meteorology)Joint (building)Test dataMaterials scienceBearing (navigation)Fracture (geology)Nonlinear systemStress (linguistics)EngineeringComposite materialComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the ANSYS software to test of the reinforced beams bearing phase of the nonlinear finite element analysis.On the basis of test data,determine the part of finite element simulation need parameters and other parameters can be obtained through experience.This paper completely according to the test beam size,in vitro prestressed steel wires arrangement situation and carbon fiber cloth paste site conditions to establish model,and many times to adjust check,and finally determine the numerical scheme.Through the software calculation results can understand test beam in the normal operating condition of the fracture morphology,structure deformation and stress and strain of concrete,the joint reinforced concrete beam deformation property have further understanding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Jilin Institute of Architecture & Civil Engineering→Same topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete→French-language works237,207→