MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2350724987

The Design of Embedded System Based on UML and μC/OS-II

2005· article· en· W2350724987 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bai Rui-lin

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEmbedded Systems and FPGA Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnified Modeling LanguageComputer scienceApplications of UMLClass diagramUML toolEmbedded systemClass (philosophy)Process (computing)Programming languageSoftware
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the UML is used to describe the structure of C/OS-Ⅱ, and then is applied in the design of the embedded system based on C/OS-Ⅱ. In the first, we build the UML static model of the C/OS-Ⅱ, using class diagram. Then, through the example of a embedded filesystem design, we present the whole development process of the embedded system based on C/OS-Ⅱ using UML. The experiment results indicate that using UML in the design of complex embedded system based on RTOS and 32 bit MPU will make you development process clear and efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicEmbedded Systems and FPGA DesignFrench-language works237,207