Putrescine supplementation during in vitro maturation of aged mouse oocytes improves the quality of blastocysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mouse ovaries exhibit a peri-ovulatory rise of ornithine decarboxylase and its product putrescine concurrent with oocyte maturation. Older mice exhibit a deficiency of both the enzyme and putrescine. Peri-ovulatory putrescine supplementation in drinking water increases ovarian putrescine levels, reduces embryo resorption and increases live pups in older mice. However, it is unknown if putrescine acts in the ovaries to improve oocyte maturation. This study examined the impact of putrescine supplementation during oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM) on the developmental potential of aged oocytes. Cumulus-oocyte complexes from 9-12-month-old C57BL/6 mice were subjected to IVM with or without 0.5mM putrescine, followed by in vitro fertilisation and culture to the blastocyst stage. Putrescine supplementation during IVM did not influence the proportion of oocyte maturation, fertilisation or blastocyst formation, but significantly increased blastocyst cell numbers (44.5±1.9, compared with 36.5±1.9 for control; P=0.003). The putrescine group also had a significantly higher proportion of blastocysts with top-grade morphology (42.9%, compared with 26.1% for control; P=0.041) and a greater proportion with octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4)-positive inner cell mass (38.3%, compared with 19.8% for control; P=0.005). Therefore, putrescine supplementation during IVM improves egg quality of aged mice, providing proof of principle for possible application in human IVM procedures for older infertile women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".