MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2350750047

Purification Effect of Ecological Floating Bed on Water Quality of an Estuary

2008· article· en· W2350750047 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuaryWater qualityPollutantEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringDilutionPortable water purificationEcologyHydrology (agriculture)EngineeringBiologyGeotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By analyzing water quality difference before and after construction of floating bed,before and after removal of floating bed as well as between the bedside and open waterway,the purification effect of ecological floating bed on an estuary was investigated,and its purification mechanism was analyzed.The results are as follows:① the ecological floating bed can remove pollutants effectively,the net removal rates of TP,TN and NH+4-N are 10.4%,8.1% and 18.1% respectively;② Because of the complexity of nitrogen recycle,the removal rates of NO-3-N and NO-2-N are negative;③ Water quality improvement of the project can be contributed to the comprehensive effects of lake water dilution,estuary self-purification and ecological floating bed;④ After removal of the ecological floating bed,the purification effect on the estuary gets worse,and the removal rates of TP,TN and NH+4-N are only 18.2%,9.2% and 27.8% respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207