MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2350816629

Assessment of Soil Contamination due to Heavy Metals: A Case Study of Rakhial Industrial Area

2016· article· en· W2350816629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pooja Saini

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of advance research and innovative ideas in education · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeavy metalsSoil waterEnvironmental sciencePollutionContaminationSoil testMetalEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringSoil contaminationSoil scienceMetallurgyMaterials scienceChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to investigate the current status of heavy metal soil pollution in one of the cradles of industry in India, the Rakhial Industrial area in the city of Ahmedabad, Twenty-five soil samples were collected from the top 5 cm of the soil layer and were analyzed for heavy metal concentrations of Cu, Ni, Zn and Cr. The data reveal a remarkable variation in heavy metal concentration among the sampled soils; the mean concentrations of Cu, Ni, Zn and Cr were compared with the standards of different countries like Canada, Australia, Norway, Taiwan etc. for Maximum allowable limits of heavy metals in soil. Soil samples were also analyzed to determine fixed metals present in soils if any and results showed that all metals were fixed solids and do not get carried away with rain water. GIS Mapping of study area for each metal will be done to demonstrate the distribution of heavy metals concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of advance research and innovative ideas in educationSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207