MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2350954396 · doi:10.22329/p.v9i2.4287

Maxine Sheets-Johnstone, "The Corporeal Turn: An Interdisciplinary Reader"

2014· article· en· W2350954396 on OpenAlex
Corijn van Mazijk

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhaenEx · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEmbodied and Extended Cognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurn (biochemistry)Art historyArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What is "the corporeal turn"? According to Maxine Sheets-Johnstone, it is a broad interdisciplinary development concerning questions, concepts, and relationships that derive from and center on the body and bodily life. Not only does the term make implicit reference to the well-known "linguistic turn" of the first half of the 20 th century, but it similarly connotes quite adequately a feel of retrieving. Sheets-Johnstone's works represent a desire to uncover a more original understanding of and enquiry into life. One of the most praiseworthy features of her 30 years-long philosophical enterprise is its consistent obsession with constructing new perspectives on these issues rather than being involved with the topics as they stand. Consequently, the interdisciplinary reader The Corporeal Turn and her recent articles alike are truly works of a philosopher: they explore before giving answers. Unfortunately, this kind of writing has its downsides, since it often cannot provide readymade methods or answers that can be taken over by others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it