The value of auditory event-related potentials in the assessment of cognitive function of patients with subcortical ischemic vascular disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To observe the abnormality of the long latency components and the subcomponents of N2 complex of auditory event-related potentials(ERPs) in the aged patients with subcortical ischemic vascular disease (SIVD),and evaluate their values in assessing the cognitive function of SIVD. Method:The SIVD group included 8 patients clinically diagnosed with SIVD,and the control group included 8 healthy subjects whose sex and age matched with those in SIVD group. Their ERPs were recorded during an active auditory discrimination task of classic oddball paradigm. And then they were assessed by neuropsychological tests including minimental status examination(MMSE) and the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Result:Compared with the controls,the latencies of N2 complex and N2b at FZ site were significantly longer in SIVD group (P0.05),the scores of MMSE and MoCA slightly decreased but without significance. Conclusion:It's possibly seemed that the injury of SIVD mainly reduced the latency of N2 complex. So the latency of N2 complex and N2b might be chosen as an objective measurement in assessing the cognitive function of aged patients with SIVD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".