MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2351010258

Analysis on Canada Uranium Mining and Cooperation Prospects with China

2011· article· en· W2351010258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wu Cuilian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of East China Institute of Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUraniumProspectingLeaseUranium oreChinaBusinessMineral resource classificationInvestment (military)Natural resource economicsEnriched uraniumMining engineeringGeologyGeochemistryEconomicsGeographyFinancePolitical scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada is the world's major uranium resources,which deposits are known as higher grade and larger reserve.It is essential that understanding of Canadian uranium mining industry is useful for us formulating uranium exploration thread and establishing orientation of policy in resources survey and market trade.Canadian uranium history of survey,discovery and production,uranium market and trade,and uranium mining policy are illustrated.Our going global strategic orientation should focus on extending uranium supply volume of long-term agreement with Canada as far as possible,at the same time,it is an important supplementary means of cooperation or joint investment in uranium exploration and mining,or starting risk mineral prospecting from lease land and application for mineral right in relatively loose province or territory in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of East China Institute of TechnologySame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207