MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2351065664

On Compliance Issues of Currency Reform for Fair Trade Act——From the Perspective of IMF and WTO

2011· article· en· W2351065664 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
HE Xiao-yon

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsidyCurrencyJurisdictionExchange rateInternational economicsEconomicsInternational tradeSovereigntyRenminbiBusinessPolitical scienceLawMonetary economicsMarket economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In September 2010,House of Representatives of United States passed Currency Reform for Fair Trade Act which is characterized as imposing currency exchange-rate policy into international trade by stipulating that fundamentally undervalued currencyconsititutes subsidies.The Act,however,violates international law in three aspects.First,its characterized measure is inconsistent with IMF Agreement and WTO Agreement on jurisdiction matters;second,United States has no right to unilaterally determine exchange rate undervaluation of other countries;third,according to standards provided by SCM Agreement,fundamentally undervalued currency does not contain features of export subsidies.For China,it is advised to insist exchange rate is of national sovereignty,explore ways to alleviate exchange-rate pressure from the United States,and resort to WTO dispute settlement body when necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.057
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0570.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.016
Scholarly communication0.0150.015
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0410.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207