MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2351147008

Study on the self-care ability and its related factors in patients with mild cognitive impairment

2009· article· en· W2351147008 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Feng Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueJONA The Journal of Nursing Administration · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDementiaCognitionActivities of daily livingCognitive impairmentMedicineIntervention (counseling)GerontologySignificant differencePhysical therapyClinical psychologyPsychologyInternal medicinePsychiatryDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the self-care agency and its related factors in patients with mild cognitive impairment(MCI),so as to provide reference for nursing intervention.Method The outpatients with MCI and dementia were investigated with Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices(SRAHP),Activity of Daily Living Scale(ADL),and Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA).Results The average score of SRAHP was(91.24±20.61)points in patients with MCI,which had significant difference between the group of patients with MCI and patients with dementia(P0.01),while no significant difference with the group of patients without cognitive impairment(P0.05).The score of SRAHP was related to the patients' educational level,economic status,ADL,and cognitive status(P0.01).Conclusion The patients with MCI have intact self-care ability which is affected by multiple factors and show individual differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJONA The Journal of Nursing AdministrationSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207