MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2351511404

DNA Extraction and Optimization of ISSR-PCRReaction System for Fritillaria walujewii

2012· article· en· W2351511404 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jun Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimer (cosmetics)DNA extractionDNATaq polymerasePolymerase chain reactionSystem optimizationBiologyChromatographyGermplasmMolecular biologyExtraction (chemistry)Genetic diversityDNA polymeraseChemistryBotanyGeneticsThermus aquaticusGeneMathematicsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking dried leaves of Fritillaria walujewii as material,optimizing a DNA extraction method,establishing and optimizing ISSR-PCR Reaction System.Methods DNA was Extracted by optimized DNA extraction method;The ISSR-PCRreaction system for Fritillaria walujewii was optimized in five levels of five factors(DNA template,My2+,primer,dNTPs and DNA Taq polymerase)by single-factor experiment and in three levels of four factors by orthogonal experiment,and the gradient PCR was used to determine the annealing temperature of primer.Result The optimal PCR(20 μL) mixture contained 0.2 mmol/L dNTP,2.0 mmol/L Mg2+,60-80 ng template DNA,1.2 μmol/L primer,1 U Taq DNA polymerase.The suitable annealing temperature of primer UBC 859 was 50.7 ℃.Conclusion By the method of DNA Extraction,we get high purity template DNA,which can be used for ISSR-PCR amplification.The establishment of ISSR-PCR system could laid foundation for ISSR analysis on studies of germplasm resources and the genetic diversity of Fritillaria walujewii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207