Mild vascular cognitive impairment in aged patients with lacunar cerebral infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To study the incidence of mild vascular cognitive impairment(MVCI) in aged patients with lacunar infarction(LI) and the effect of MVCI at different locations on cognitive domains. Methods One hundred and twenty aged patients with LI enrolled in this study and 84 patients without stroke served as LI group and control group,respectively.Their cognitive function was assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA).Results The incidence of MVCI was higher in LI group than in control group(45.83%vs 26.19%,P0.05).The total score of MoCA and the scores of visual space,executive function,nomenclature,attention power,calculation ability, linguistic function,ive ability,delayed recall,and orientation force were lower in LI group than in control group(P0.01).Conclusion The incidence of MVCI is high in aged patients with LI.MVCI exerts its effect on different cognitive domains,especially on space and executive capacity,memory and linguistic function.Executive dysfunction is the significant feature of aged patients with LI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".