The Spatial Analysis of Economic Structure Dynamic Evolution in Central China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Taking prefecture-level cities as the basic research units,using the weighted center of gravity models,spatial au tocorrelation and other spatial analysis methods,this paper analyzes the economic migration,economic disparities and con centration,economic growth,the evolution of spatial pattern of central China in nearly 20 years.The result as follows,firstly,since 1991,the central region’s economic center excursion trend shows in direction ofM typein general which isnorth west → north → southwest → south,and the economic development in the western and northern of central China is prior than the east and south.Secondly,the level of regional economic agglomeration areas is similar and evident,which focused on hot spots in Wuhan,Zhengzhou and other provincial capital cities,and gradually form city groups and the economic growth pole.Thirdly,economic growth centralization in central China is evident,which is noticeable from 1998 to 2005,and becomes weakened after the year of 2006.Considering that in different periods,the economic growth centralization shows a trend of in creasing to decreasing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it