A comparison on deep structure and spreading evolution between South China Sea and Labrador Sea
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deep seismic surveys over the extinct ridge of central sub-basin of South China Sea(SCS) are critical for understanding the evolution and geodynamic mechanism of SCS.In this article,the interior crustal structure of the extinct ridge in the Labrador Sea was reviewed and compared it with the SCS in several aspects,then the preliminary understandings was obtained about the formation and mechanism of extinct ridges.The results showed that both extinct seas belonged to slow-spreading ridges.their formation processes were controlled primarily by tectonism other than by magmatism,and their crustal structures showed high similarity.Ridge jump occurring in both of Labrador Sea and SCS,indicated significant tectonic events during spreading process.Both seas having nonvolcanic asymmetric continental margins,suggested that the extension of lithosphere played a more important role comparing with magmatic activities in the initial spreading stage.This research should provide important ideas and evidences for future studying of the crustal structures and geological interpretation for the extinct ridge in the central subbasin of SCS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it