Impact of large and small artery lesions on cognitive function after acute ischemic stroke
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of large and small artery lesions on cognitive function after acute ischemic stroke. Methods: 60 cases of patients with acute ischemic stroke were collected and divided into large artery lesion group and small artery lesion group based on the TOAST classification diagnosis criteria and iconography data, with 17 cases in large artery lesion group and 43 cases in small artery lesion group. Cognitive function of two groups was evaluated and compared with each other by MoCA scale at 90 days after the stroke. Results: The numbers of ischemic area in cortex and frontal lobe of large artery lesion group are more than small artery lesion group(P0.05), but in pons the result is contrary(P0.05). The MoCA scores of naming, attention, language and abstraction in large artery lesion group were lower than those in small artery lesion group(P0.05, P0.05). Conclusion: The cognitive impairment of large artery lesion after acute ischemic stroke is much severer than that of small artery lesion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it