MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352030553

Optimum Array Processing Toolbox Based on MATLAB

2008· article· en· W2352030553 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaochuan Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMATLABToolboxComputer scienceGraphical user interfaceBeamformingKey (lock)Array processingComputational scienceSimulationSignal processingAlgorithmComputer hardwareDigital signal processingProgramming languageTelecommunicationsOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Designing optimum array processing toolbox based on MATLAB.It include the base methods of the beamforming and optimum array processing, such as conventional method and Dolph-Chebychev method.The GUI(graphical user interfaces) of the MATLAB is applied to computer simulation program ,we can choose the value of the key parameter.The application of GUI make the result practical and efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207