MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352103894

Study on protection harm of H_2S for petroleum exploitation

2011· article· en· W2352103894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wang Shun-hua

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Safety Science and Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Gas Emission Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCountermeasurePetroleumPetroleum engineeringWaste managementHarmEngineeringEnvironmental scienceGeologyLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the many sulfides in petroleum exploitation,H2S ocuppies the major ratio.Heavy reservoir accompany H2S gas,and thermal recovery technology will accelerate H2S production and density rising.Because H2S make olfactory nerve paralysis,it is not easy to flari odor,which lead to the occurance of lightning intoxication death and cause great harm.During petroleum exploitation applying general protection technique and carrying out new efficiency desulfurizer and high efficiency absorption sulphur fixing agents device,have important practical significance.Study and drew on Canada Oilfield protection experience of H2S,and bulid our country work licensing system of oil and gas wells contained H2S.A deep lesson should be learned from the major accident happened in 12·23 ChongQing Kai xian LuoJia's 16H gas well blowout due to the lost control and hydrogen sulfide poisoning.During exploiting oil and gas wells contained H2S,only earnestly taking safety education and alarm of protection H2S,fulfiling countermeasure of protection H2S,setting down detailed emergency response plan of accident,and organizing regularity emergency drilling,the purpose of avoiding the potential danger can be achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Safety Science and TechnologySame topicIndustrial Gas Emission ControlFrench-language works237,207