MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352177834

Study Promoting Seed Germination Ways to 4 Wild Flower Species

2009· article· en· W2352177834 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEcology and Conservation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationBiologyHorticultureBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before study showed that four wild flower seeds i.e.Trollius chinensis,Aconitum barbatum var.puberulum,Papaver naudicaule and Veronicastrum sibiricum have lower germination rate in low temperature condition.Germination rate and germination potention promoted obviously,and the germination process accerlated through different temperature,different GA concention and light cycle treatment.The result showed that seed germination rate increased to 84% from 4%of control which treatmented with 500 mg/L GA3,then putting Trollius chinensis seed in 25 ℃ and 8 h light +16 h dark,and Aconitum barbatum var.puberulum and Veronicastrum sibiricum seed get germination rate increased to 82.4% from 20% of control which treatmented with 500 mg/L GA3,then put in 15 ℃、12 h light +12h dark,and 100% comparing 17.3%of control for Veronicastrum sibiricum,separately;Germination rate of Papaver naudicaule seed increased to 61.3% from 29.3% of contro which treatmented with 125 mg/L GA3 and putting under 15 ℃,24 h light.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicEcology and Conservation StudiesFrench-language works237,207