MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352200706

Edge Segmentation Algorithm Based on Morphological Gradient Vector

2005· article· en· W2352200706 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorphological gradientImage gradientEdge detectionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionImage segmentationAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionSegmentationMathematical morphologyOperator (biology)Image (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceImage processing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The image edge is explained by the gradient.As a vector variable,the gradient has two parts: the magnitude and the direction.The morphological gradient operator,i.e.a popular edge detection operator can detect only the magnitude of the image edge and cannot detect the direction of the image edge,thus lost the information of the edge gradient.This paper presents a new gray level morphological gradient method.The method points out that there is a morphological gradient operator with the direction estimate on the edge detection.The algorithm is validated theoretically and experimentally.The fuzzy process is added into the serial operators,so the noise in the image can be controlled and the clarity of the image edge be increased.Meanwhile,the optimal threshold segmentation is improved by adjusting the optimal threshold values of different directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it