MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352200706

Edge Segmentation Algorithm Based on Morphological Gradient Vector

2005· article· en· W2352200706 on OpenAlexaff
Yong Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorphological gradientImage gradientEdge detectionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionImage segmentationAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionSegmentationMathematical morphologyOperator (biology)Image (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceImage processing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The image edge is explained by the gradient.As a vector variable,the gradient has two parts: the magnitude and the direction.The morphological gradient operator,i.e.a popular edge detection operator can detect only the magnitude of the image edge and cannot detect the direction of the image edge,thus lost the information of the edge gradient.This paper presents a new gray level morphological gradient method.The method points out that there is a morphological gradient operator with the direction estimate on the edge detection.The algorithm is validated theoretically and experimentally.The fuzzy process is added into the serial operators,so the noise in the image can be controlled and the clarity of the image edge be increased.Meanwhile,the optimal threshold segmentation is improved by adjusting the optimal threshold values of different directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Measurement and Detection MethodsFrench-language works237,207