MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352235368

Growth Predicament of Teenagers Growing up in Divorced Family and Intervention of Family Social Work

2013· article· en· W2352235368 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Jiangsu Vocational and Technical Institute of Economics and Commerce · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsLa Cité Collégiale
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)PsychologyInterpersonal communicationSocial psychologySocial workWork (physics)FellIdentity (music)Family therapySociologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychotherapistPolitical scienceLawPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Divorce refers to the spouses dissolve a marriage by the way of agreement or suit to terminate the legal rights and obligations between each other. Divorced family is a form of single-parent family. Compared with teenagers growing up in two-parent families,those who grow up in divorced family are more likely to fell into predicament in the process of self-identity,interpersonal communication,social cognition and resource acquisition. Family social work get involved in the growth predicament teenagers growing up in divorced family confront by the way of case work,team work,community work,social policy and family therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it