MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352312029

Research on the Rapid Propagation Technology of Liriope platyphyla in Vitro

2010· article· en· W2352312029 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuejuan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExplant cultureRhizomeSterilization (economics)In vitroHorticultureBotanyTissue cultureBiologyBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using rhizome and buds of Liriope platyphylla as experimental materials,the system regeneration in vitro was established through some preparing culture and sterilization method.The results showed:(1)the pollution rate of explant decreased which hydroponiced 7d before culture in vitro and sterilized 25min by 0.1% HgCl2 could decrease pollution and increase the rate of inducing buds.(2)The most optimized explant type for inducing buds was the upper and middle part of the rhizoma,which the rate of inducing buds was the highest and the rate of multiplication was the rapidest.(3)The optimized medium for rhizome culturing was MS+BA2.0mg/L+NAA0.5mg/L,which could increase multiplication and promote buds become integrated seedlings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207