MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352363416

On Freedom of the Press in the French Revolution and Napoleonic Era

2012· article· en· W2352363416 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Weihua Han

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Communication · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFreedom of the pressFrench revolutionGovernment (linguistics)Power (physics)EmpireQuarter (Canadian coin)SociologyLawEconomic historyPolitical scienceHistoryPhilosophyPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The French Revolution and the Napoleonic era witnessed France's critical transition from old regime to modern society.During the quarter-century from the outbreak of the 1789 Revolution to the collapse of the Napoleonic empire, the French government promulgated multiple laws regarding the freedom of press,yet,most of which were poorly executed.At that time,two of the most prominent liberalists Benjamin Constant and Madame de Stael paid tremendous attention to the issue of freedom of speech,emphasizing that free press are the most significant method of constraining abuse of power.To delineate the evolution of French policies on freedom of the press will deepen our understanding of France's twisty road to media freedom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International CommunicationSame topicPolitical Theory and InfluenceFrench-language works237,207