The clinical application value of marrow edema SPARCC score of sacroiliac joint in ankylosing spondylitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To analyze the clinical application value of marrow edema SPARCC score of sacroiliac joint(SIJs)in ankylosing spondylitis(AS).Methods:45 cases with AS confirmed clinically were included.The patients were evaluated by BASDAI score and examined by MRI and CT in SIJs.All SIJs were scored according to the spondyloarthritis research consortium of Canada(SPARCC)for bone marrow edema.Correlative analysis was performed between SPARCC score and BASDAI score.According to the CT grade of SIJs of patients with AS,the patients were divided into two groups(the grade of 0~II and the grade ofⅢ~Ⅳ).Comparative analysis of SPARCC score was done between two groups.Results:Spearman correlation coefficient between SPARCC score and BASDAI score was 0.645(P0.05).There was not statistical difference of SPARCC score between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion:SPARCC score for bone marrow edema can be a base to judge the activity of AS,and can effectively monitor the disease activity of AS patients in the whole process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".