MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352494250

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE CRACK GROWTH IN PRESSURIZED CYLINDERS UNDER CREEP CONDITION

2012· article· en· W2352494250 on OpenAlexaff
Jian‐Feng Wen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepMaterials scienceCrack closureStress intensity factorFinite element methodCylinderInternal pressureCrack growth resistance curveMechanicsCrack tip opening displacementStructural engineeringFracture mechanicsComposite materialMathematicsGeometryEngineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the study of metal creep,more and more efforts are being devoted to the materials and structures containing defects.Surface crack shape variation is one of the important issues in the study of leak-before-break(LBB) procedure.However,little attention has been paid to creep crack growth of surface cracks by numerical simulation.In the present study,a numerical analysis has been conducted on a low alloy Cr-Mo steel cylinder subjected to internal pressure at high temperature,with semi-elliptical crack located at the inner surface.The stress intensity factors(SIFs) and creep crack driving force parameter C*-integrals,calculated by numerical methods,are compared with results from previous studies.Good agreement has been obtained by comparing SIF,which demonstrates the FE(finite elememnt) model is reliable.The empirical equations of C*-integral,however,may be inaccurate under some condition.Moreover,the creep crack growth described by C*-integral is investigated using three-dimensional finite element analyses and a step-by-step analysis procedure based on codes ABAQUS is illustrated.Finally,crack profile development,C*-integral variation,crack depth,crack length and remaining life prediction are presented by studying several cases of different initial aspect ratios.It is observed that under monotonic internal pressure,the magnitude of crack length increment decreases as the initial aspect ratio ranges from 1 to 1/6,which is always minor compared with the crack depth increment.The crack profiles vary approaching to semi-circles and the aspect ratios increase all the time whatever the initial aspect ratio would be.In the final stage of the analyses,the boundary effect has been observed in C*-integral calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207