Effects of Temperature and Variety on Germination and Seedling Growth of Naked Barley
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of temperature on naked barley seed germination and seedling growth was studied using four varieties( black,white,dark green and flowers varieties),and the differences of different varieties' seed germination characteristics was analyzed at different temperatures. The results showed that all samples' seeds germination potential,germination rate and germination index increased with increasing temperature in the range of 10- 25 ℃,and reached a maximum at 25 ℃. Meanwhile,these seed germination indicators showed a slight decline at 30 ℃. On the other hand,the naked barley seedling growth and biomass was most optimal at25 ℃. So the seed germination and seedling growth of naked barley were better at lower temperature and 25 ℃was the best temperature in our study. For different varieties,the seed germination,seedling growth and biomass index were descending in the order of black barley,dark green barley,flower barley and white barley in the same treatment temperature. In the actual production,it must be pay special attention to the selection of appropriate seed sowing for seeds with low germination rate and growth retardation,because low temperature affect seed germination and seedling growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it