MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352559250

Comparative Study on Anti- dumping Trade Barriers and China's Steel Foreign Trade Issues

2013· article· en· W2352559250 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wang La-fan

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Survey · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGeochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDumpingChinaIndex (typography)International tradeBalance of tradeEconomicsInternational economicsRenminbiBusinessGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper calculates the anti- dumping investigations index and the anti- dumping definitive measures index against China's steel products by horizontal and vertical comparison. Using the formula of antidumping intensity index,the paper also calculated the anti- dumping intensity index and its influence suffered form the main originating countries or regions. Finally,using the econometrical model,the relationship among the anti- dumping behavior and the balance of trade and import proportion has been analyzed.The findings show: during 1999 ~ 2009,the number of anti- dumping against China's steel products ranks No. 1,but the anti-dumping investigations index and the anti- dumping definitive measures index are rank No. 3,after India and South Korea,indicating that the affection by foreign AD actions on Chinese steel exports are turned from slightly to badly. Main originating countries or regions are U. S. A,Canada and Mexico,etc. Expand of the trade deficit of China's steel exports and the proportion of steel products imported from China was strongly affected by anti- dumping activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic SurveySame topicGeochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral DepositsFrench-language works237,207