MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352638622

Design and analysis of blast test of underground arch structure

2013· article· en· W2352638622 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchStructural engineeringEngineeringInstallationAccelerationDisplacement (psychology)Test methodMechanical engineeringGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To research the response of arch structure under dynamic loading,an explosion test was designed according to the explosion principle,theory of sensor technology and the requirements of explosion on underground arch structure.The arch structure made by reinforced concrete was buried after installing sensors.In order to obtain valid measurement data,several types of sensors were used in the tests,including strain sensor,acceleration sensor,pressure sensor,displacement sensor,etc.In this paper,the basic requirements of explosion experiment on underground arch structure,as well as its basic principle,were introduced,and the dynamic test system mainly composed of sensors,initiation of explosion and synchronized trigger and data acquisition and storage,was constructed.Judged from the phenomena and results,this test can meet the requirements of blast test,and provide the reference for other similar test and the basis of the design of underground arch structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Response to Dynamic LoadsFrench-language works237,207