PUNCTATE MIDLINE MYELOTOMY FOR THE TREATMET OF INTRACTABLE VISCERAL CANCER PAIN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To study the effectiveness of punctate midline myelotomy (PMM)for the treatment of intractable visceral cancer pain. Methods: PMM was performed in 4 patients with intractable visceral cancer pain, including one case of pelvic pain, one case of celiac pain and two cases of both pelvic and celiac pain. The PMM was successfully performed at the spinal cord T_2, T_7 or T_8 level. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ) were used for the evaluation of preoperative and postoperative pain. Results: All 4 cases of visceral cancer pain had immediate pain relief after operation. In the follow-up periods ranging from 5 to 13 months, the postoperative pain was reduced significantly (P0.01) as compared to the preoperation. No severe side effects occured. Conclusion: PMM is a simple, safe and highly effective method for treating intractable visceral pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".