MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352678258

THE DISTRIBUTION,DEVELOPMENT AND EXPECTATION OF SHALE GAS RESOURCES

2010· article· en· W2352678258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jiang Huai-you

Bibliographic record

VenueResources and Industries · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShale gasOil shaleChinaNatural gasGeologyGovernment (linguistics)Natural resourcePetroleum engineeringUnconventional oilBusinessNatural resource economicsMining engineeringGeochemistryGeographyPaleontologyPolitical scienceEconomicsWaste managementEngineeringArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exploration of shale gas resources becomes a focus of the world.The natural gas resources are 636.283×1012 m3 in the world.Shale gas resources are rich in America,most of them are distributed in southern,central and eastern parts.There also are plenty of shale gas resources in China,nearly the same quantity as in America.In America there is the most advanced exploration and exploitation technology,and it is the only country which has the highest exploitation method.Canada has a long history of shale gas exploration and exploitation.China is still at the beginning for the shale gas exploitation.The permeability of the shale rocks is normally very low,so it is difficult to be exploited.Therefore,we need to learn the advanced foreign technology to develop a set of exploitation methods to develop our shale gas reservoirs,and we need the support from the government,increasing environmental protection while development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources and IndustriesSame topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207