MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352699922

Effects of Seeds Soaking with 2,4-D on Seeds Germination and Seeding Growth of Cucurbita pepo

2009· article· en· W2352699922 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhigang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEcology and Conservation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCucurbita pepoGerminationSeedingHorticulturePumpkin seedCucurbitaChemistryBiologyAgronomyBotanyFood science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experiment was carried out to explore effects of seeds soaking with 2,4-D on two species seeds germination and seedlings growth of Cucurbita pepo.The results showed that 0.1mg/L 2,4-D promoted the germination rate,germination power,vigor index for two species,5mg/L and 10mg/L 2,4-D restrained significantly the seeds germination,the higher of the 2,4-D concentration,the more significant of inhabitation;1mg/L 2,4-D increased the growth of young root;The effect of 2,4-D on the contents of MDA was not significant when 2,4-D concentration ranged from 0.1mg/L to 1mg/L,the MDA contents and the soluble protein contents became higher with the increasing of 2,4-D concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicEcology and Conservation StudiesFrench-language works237,207