MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2353217849

A Kind of Solution that Raises the Credit Card Safety

2007· article· en· W2353217849 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhao Zheng-wen

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Rights Management and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredit cardPasswordComputer scienceComputer securityChargebackCredit card interestIssuerATM cardCard security codeInternet privacyBusinessPaymentFinanceWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The traditional credit card CCT(the credit card transactions)have a password,the consumer and the card issuerses all know,while using again and again is not very safe.For the sake of the safe bargain of the exaltation credit card,we change for only the issuer knows the password,but the consumer is to do not need to know the password.Our method is to put the information of the less on a miniature chip,and put it on the credit card,and can be easily on-line and off-line to launch the long range bargain.Can make the consumer safe to trade,the aggressor can't attackstone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicDigital Rights Management and SecurityFrench-language works237,207