Protective effects of tea-Orange tablets on alcoholic hepatic injury.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tea-Orange Tablets were made from extracts of Satian pomelo and tea. Acute and chronic alcoholic hepatic injury animal models were setup to test the protective effects of tea-orange tablets from pomelo peel and tea extract. Acute alcoholic hepatic injury mice models were setup by oral administration of 50% alcohol twice a day for 10 days. Compared to control group, tea-orange tablets (100 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg and 900 mg/kg) could reduce serum TG and MDA contents, and improve activity of GSH-Px, showing dose dependence (p0.001). Chronic alcoholic hepatic injury rat models was setup by oral administration of 50% alcohol (4 g/kg, p.o.) and 25% CCl4 (0.1 mL/kg, i.p.) for 8 weeks. Oral administration of tea-orange tablets (70, 210 and 630mg/kg) could significantly reduce contents of ALT, MDA and CHO, and improve contentsof ALB and activity of SOD (p0.001). Tea-orange tablets were in rich of flavones material and had protective effects to acute and chronic alcoholic hepatic injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".