Effects of Biofeedback Therapy on Neurologic Function,Anxiety and Depression of Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To explore the effects of biofeedback therapy(BFT)on anxiety,depression and neurologic function of acute cerebral infarction patients.Methods:One hundred five patients with anxiety and depression after acute cerebral infarction were randomly divided into groups control,observation and experimental.All the patients were given conventional therapy.Both observation and experimental group were given Fluoxetine,while the experimental group were given additional biofeedback therapy.The anxiety and depression of patients were evaluated by Hamilton Depression(HAMD)and Hamilton Anxiety(HAMA).The activity of daily life(ADL)of patients were measured by Modified Barthel Index(MBI)and the neurologic function were analysed by Canadian neurological Scale(CNS).Results:The neurologic function recovery in the experimental,observation and control groups were 91.5%,65.7%,and 45.7% respectively,and the anxiety and depression recovery 89.2%,71.4%,and 40% respectively.The neurologic function recovery in both experimental and observation groups was significantly better than in the control group(P0.01).Conclusion:The biofeedback therapy can improve anxiety,depression and neurologic function of patients after acute cerebral infarction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".