MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2353409833

General Model of Stator Winding for Synchronous Generator FEM Calculation

2008· article· en· W2353409833 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall & Special Electrical Machines · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Voltage Power Transmission Systems
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatorFinite element methodElectromagnetic coilGenerator (circuit theory)Permanent magnet synchronous generatorShunt generatorLine (geometry)MagnetProcess (computing)Control theory (sociology)EngineeringMechanical engineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringMathematicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringGeometryPower (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the general regulation of winding diagram,a basic vector was used for describing the stator winding,then it was easy to set up and analyze the model of stator winding,this describing method was suited for most common windings.The calculation process was simpler in FEM analysis if the winding model was created by this method stated,and the FEM.The calculation example was shown,the line of magnetic force and magnet density were calculated in this example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it