Evaluation of an artificial liquid diet of Orius similis Zheng (Hemiptera:Anthocoridae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To evaluate an artificial liquid diet of Orius similis Zheng,the nymph and adult of O.similis were fed on the artificial diet for two generations continuously using cotton aphids as the control,and their developmental and reproductive indexes at different stages were investigated.The results showed that the durations(22-23 days)of the two consecutive generations of O.similis were not significantly different from that of the control(21 days),which suggested that the diet could well meet the nutritional need of the nymph of O.similis for growth and development.However,the obtainable rate of the adult of O.similis fed on the cotton aphids could achieve 63%,which was prominently greater than those of the two consecutive generations of O.similis fed on the artificial liquid diet,which were 45% and 43%,respectively.There were no significant differences in the period of pre-oviposition,the fecundity and longevity of the adult of O.similis between the treatments and the control.But the significant difference was observed in the period of oviposition between the treatments and the control,which are about 13-16 days for the treatments and 20 days for the control,respectively.These results suggested that the artificial liquid diet could also well meet the nutritional need of adult O.similis for reproduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".