MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2353428122

Effects of Different Periods Applied Fe~(2+) and Concentrations on Fe and Cd Contents in Iron Plaque on Rice Root

2004· article· en· W2353428122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agro-environmental Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNutrientChemistryRice plantHorticultureAnimal scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of different Fe 2+ concentrations(0,30,50and 70mg ·L -1 )on Fe and Cd contents in iron plaque of rice root at different growth stages(tillering,jointing,booting and fi lling)individually and continually were s tudied by a combined culture systemof Cd -polluted soil -sand -nutrient solution.The results showed that Fe contents in iron plaque in the treatments receiving Fe 2+ in nutrient solution culture were greater than that in control treatment (0mg ·L -1 )in solution culture,especially at both booting stage during rice growing period and after harvest.The change of Fe contents in iron plaque in the treatments at filling was greater than that in treatment at both tillering and jointing periods.The Cd contents in iron plaque of rice fo llowed the similar trend like iron.Fe contents in iron plaque in the treatments at all stages from t illering to filling were the highest at 50mg ·L -1 of Fe 2+ concentration compared with other Fe 2+ concentrations.Cd contents in rice root in the treatment at all stages fr om tillering to filling were well in accordance with Fe conte nts in iron plaque.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it