MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2353534902

Observation and nursing of pain in operation of prepuce circular resection

2007· article· en· W2353534902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Me

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo xiao-yi · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNursingIntervention (counseling)FeelingIntensity (physics)ResectionPhysical therapySurgeryPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To observe the pain intensity of patients in the operation of prepuce circular resection in order to explore the nursing approach for decreasing the pain.Methods Pain intensity was determined by the McGill questionnaire method.Moreover,some nursing treatments,including psychological nursing,basic nursing in operation room,and behavior interference,were carried out according to the patients' status. Results Pain was occurred in(69.23) percent of patients in the process of operation,and grade Ⅰ to grade Ⅱ pain intensity were felt by 65.38 percent of patients.However,the effective nursing intervention could ease the pain by some extent,even the pain feeling could disappear in some patients. Conclusions Nursing intervention is an effective approach to ease the pain of patients in operation of prepuce circular resection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo xiao-yiSame topicMedical Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207