MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2353609078

Study on Application Potential of Innovative Maize Inbred Lines

2008· article· en· W2353609078 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhiwei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Quality and Pollution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiallel crossHeterosisInbred strainGrain yieldAgronomyBiologyCultivarTraitBreedYield (engineering)MathematicsGeneHybridAnimal scienceGeneticsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using the 20 innovative inbred lines and 3 inbred lines of maize,60 crosses were made according to incomplete diallel crosses of 20×3 to study on general combining ability and its genetic parameters of 9 traits,such as grain yield etc...The result indicated that the inbred lines of Taixi 1,Taixi 7 and Taixi 8 with good comprehensive character,so it can breed better hybrid cultivar as a parent.The heterosis expression of all trait studied are mainly controlled by additive gene action but the non-additive gene action are important in plant height,Yield per trial plot,plant height,ear position and grain number row those are obviously influenced by environment.In maize breeding program,ear length,cob diameter and weight per 100 grain should be selected in early generation,but grain yield,plant height and grain number row should be selected in later generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicEnvironmental Quality and PollutionFrench-language works237,207