Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation aims to examine the English writer Virginia Woolf attempts of apprehending, through the handling and of the reflection on the written word, all the complexity that her sensibility inferred in the human experience. For that, we sought to follow the tracks left by the frequent metalinguistics discussion that the author establishes in her work concerning the nature and the possibilities of the narrative. This work accompanies different moments in the career of Woolf through the analysis of four of the stories compiled in The complete shorter fiction, organized by Susan Dick: "Memoirs of the novelist", "The Mark on the Wall", "A Summimg Up" and "The Searchlight". Through them and the investigation of the use of literary procedures considered innovative in the end of the XX Century for Woolf, this dissertation observes her literary production searching out the authorial voice. We understood that the prominence to the concept of the metalanguage, that sends to the capacity of the language to bend on herself, makes possible the problematization of the inherent subjects to the literary speech in aspects that interested the writer a lot, but also all the readers. Trying, Virginia Woolf reinvigorates the writing, at the same time she meditates about their possibilities. Tracking her paths in the stories, this work creates a type of dialogue with the English writer on subjects as the sense transitivity, the changing aspect of the word and, mainly, the anguish in getting to capture the inexpressible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.070 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".