A Practical Compensation Mechanism for the Interruptible Loads in the Power Market Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The way of efficient managing and utilizing interruptible loads is important for economic and security operation of the electricity network. The mechanism, which analyzes costs and profits in view of economical points, can compare profits of different loads by introducing the outage threshold price at first. Algorithms for determining the interruptible load compensation fee, fixed compensation fee and dynamic compensation price are then proposed according to the outage threshold price. In this way, the method connects the compensation with profit and reflects the effect of price on compensation fee dynamically. The mechanism finally provides reasonable answers to two difficult problems in current studies of interruptible loads: how loads are inspired to participate the interruptible load service and how reasonable compensation fees are determined. It also presents the calculation model for the area energy price through purchasing interruptible loads when supply and demand are balanced. Examples of outage costs for different loads in Canada are illustrated by use of simulation and the conclusion justified the proposed method feasible and practical.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it