Evaluation of Vulnerability to Drought in Hexi Oasis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the entropy method and the model of contribution, the drought vulnerability and its major contribution factors in Hexi oasis were analyzed. The results showed that: the drought vulnerability in Zhangye City, Jiuquan City and Jinchang City were in the medium level, which in Jiayuguan City was in the low level and in Wuwei City was in very high level. The spatial differentiation of drought vulnerability in Hexi oasis was consistent with urbanization level, the sensitivity to drought was closely related with urbanization level, and the ability to cope with drought was affected by economic development and natural factors, but the former's effect was more than the latter. The main contribution factors were not the same in the index hierarchy of drought vulnerability among different cities, but shared generally a convergence trend, mainly in reflected in social drought sensitivity and response to drought, natural conditions, etc. Finally, corresponding countermeasures were put forward to drought vulnerability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it