MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2353994704

Effects of Potassium Fertilizer and Phosphorus,Potassium Fertilizer Combined Application on Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Black Peanut

2010· article· en· W2353994704 on OpenAlexaff
Sun Xuewu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPeanut Plant Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFertilizerPhosphorusPoint of deliveryChemistryPotassiumPhotosynthesisAgronomyYield (engineering)PotashChlorophyllField experimentAnimal scienceHorticultureBiologyBiochemistryMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to study the effects of potassium(K) and phosphorus(P),K fertilizer combined application on physiological characteristics and yield of Black Peanut,the field experiment was conducted with peanut CV.Heihua NO.1 in the experimental station of Shandong Peanut Research Institute in 2009.The results showed that,K fertilizer had a positive effect on the content of chlorophyll and photosynthetic rate at early and middle stage.Medium level of P fertilizer combined with high level of K fertilizer could significantly increase the content of chlorophyll and photosynthetic rate.K fertilizer could markedly enhance the activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD) and catlase(CAT),and increased the content of soluble protein.But K fertilizer had no significant effect on the activity of peroxidase(POD).More sensitive response of black peanut yield to K than P was observed.The yield was higher with high rate of K under three P level,and the treatment combination with rates of low P and high K gave the highest yield among all treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeanut Plant Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207