MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2354007258

Fabrication and performance of sulfur tolerant IT-SOFC based on VO_x-Cu impregnated YSZ composite anode support

2011· article· en· W2354007258 on OpenAlexaff
Qingchun Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Functional Biomaterials · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceTape castingYttria-stabilized zirconiaElectrolyteScreen printingAnodeSinteringBilayerChemical engineeringSyngasComposite numberMicrostructurePorosityOpen-circuit voltageSolid oxide fuel cellComposite materialCeramicCatalysisCubic zirconiaElectrodeMembraneVoltage
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work,YSZ green tape was prepared by tape-casting technique,10Sc1CeSZ electrolyte was deposited on it by screen printing.The bilayer of porous YSZ substrate supported dense 10Sc1CeSZ electrolyte thin film was successfully obtained after the co-sintering process.Then,CGO and LSC films were deposited on the surface of the 10Sc1CeSZ successively by screen printing method.V2O5-CuO-YSZ composite anodes were acquired by impregnation.Microstructures analysis of bilayer before and after impregnation by SEM showed that the electrolyte was very dense,the holes in porous YSZ were connected and the catalyst uniformly distributed in the holes.At 800℃,using humidified pure H2 and syngas(40%H2,60%CO)containing 5.2×10-3 H2S as fuels,the open cell voltage(OCV) were 1.08 and 1.07V,respectively,and the maximum power densities were nearly same with the value of 37mW/cm2.The testing results demonstrated that the cells with the impregnated VOx-Cu had stable performance fed by H2S containing-syngas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Functional BiomaterialsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207