MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2354019864

Evaluating Policy on the New Energy Vehicle Industry: An AHP Approach

2015· article· en· W2354019864 on OpenAlexaff
Wang Xian-zh

Bibliographic record

VenueRoad Traffic & Safety · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalytic hierarchy processIncentiveIndex (typography)Government (linguistics)Efficient energy useIndustrial policyEnvironmental economicsOrder (exchange)Energy policyKey (lock)BusinessIndustrial organizationOperations researchComputer scienceEngineeringEconomicsRenewable energyFinanceComputer securityMicroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of the new energy vehicle industry is affected significantly by policies,and the Chinese government has introduced a series of industrial incentive policies,whereas these policies do not always achieve the desired goals. In order to analyze the interaction between the policy and the development of the new energy vehicle industry and market acceptance, this paper established an analytical hierarchy process( AHP) model to evaluate the policy efficiency of the new energy vehicle industry. This model designed the evaluation index system of the new energy vehicle industry policy,used the quantitative evaluation index weight to evaluate the policy efficiency,determined the key elements of the policy that affect the development of the new energy vehicle industry,and proposed some recommendations on the industrial development based on the policy efficiency analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoad Traffic & SafetySame topicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesFrench-language works237,207